• Desire, Dharma, and Double Standards

    What Ancient India Actually Taught Us About Morality and Hypocrisy

    “The gods of India did not hide desire.
    They ritualized it, legislated it, and sometimes broke their own rules.
    Our modern world does the opposite — we hide desire, moralize it,
    and secretly imitate the same acts behind closed doors.”


    I. The Mirror of Myth

    Our scriptures are mirrors, not manuals.
    The Mahābhārata, the Purāṇas, and the Rāmāyaṇa never pretend that human beings are simple creatures.
    They present a world where power sanctifies transgression and duty redeems desire.

    Draupadī becomes wife to five men because her mother-in-law, Kuntī, issues a careless command — and because obedience to one’s mother was holier than social custom.
    Krishna rescues sixteen thousand imprisoned women and marries them all, transforming social scandal into divine compassion.
    Arjuna lives a year disguised as a woman; Vishnu seduces gods and demons alike as Mohinī.

    These are not deviations. They are deliberate exposures of human complexity, immortalized under divine light.
    The ancients did not repress impulse; they domesticated it.
    Desire was not sin but a force to be managed — sometimes restrained, sometimes released, never denied.


    II. When the Sacred Broke Its Own Laws

    Every time a god or hero crosses a line, the text adds a warning:

    “naitat samācaret ajñaḥ”Let the ignorant not imitate this.

    The message is simple: divine acts may suspend law to restore balance, but mortals cannot invoke them as excuses for indulgence.

    Arjuna’s cross-dressing, Krishna’s playful theft of the gopīs’ garments, Shiva’s surrender to Mohinī — each episode contains both transgression and transcendence.
    Desire can overpower even divinity, yet awareness redeems it.
    The difference between lust and liberation is consciousness, not circumstance.

    Modern religion hates such grey zones.
    We prefer binaries — pious or perverse, saint or sinner.
    The ancients gave us paradox instead.


    III. The Politics of Purity

    Power has always moralized its own appetites.
    When a king abducts, it becomes elopement; when a commoner loves across caste, it becomes sin.
    When Krishna elopes with Rukmiṇī, it’s divine romance.
    When Jayadratha drags Draupadī by the hair, it’s an outrage.
    Same act, different verdict.

    Ancient India accepted hierarchy as part of cosmic order — what gods or kings could do, others could not.
    Modern India claims equality yet preserves the same privilege through silence and selective outrage.
    We make laws to display virtue and loopholes to indulge vice.
    Our morality is managerial, not moral.


    IV. Desire in the Age of Pretence

    Every modern moral panic — from women’s clothing to consensual love — hides the same anxiety our epics already explored:
    the fear that we are not as pure as we pretend.

    The Mahābhārata’s polyandry, the Purāṇas’ gender fluidity, even the Bhāgavata Purāṇa’s caution against imitating divine rāsa-līlā — all acknowledge that desire is an elemental human constant.
    Civilization does not erase it; it educates it.

    The gopīs’ surrender to Krishna is holy not because it is sensual, but because it is total.
    The same act without awareness is lust.
    The moral axis was never the body — it was the mind.

    Our shame toward sexuality isn’t morality; it’s insecurity wearing a halo.


    V. The Ruthless Lens

    To be ruthless is not to be cruel — it is to be honest.
    The ancients recorded lust, jealousy, envy, and betrayal without censorship.
    They believed that denying truth was a greater sin than committing it.

    We, their descendants, prefer optics to honesty.
    If society truly valued chastity, it would reward integrity, not theatre.
    We punish exposure but celebrate deception.
    The devout who fast by day often feast on hypocrisy by night.
    Every temple, every parliament, every household has its own Mahābhārata, rewritten daily in secrecy.


    VI. Lessons from the Chaos

    1. Study, don’t sanitize.
      Epics exist to examine the human spectrum, not to supply moral bullet points.
    2. Divine acts are metaphors, not permissions.
      Gods break rules to test dharma, not to endorse indulgence.
    3. Morality without honesty breeds hypocrisy.
      A lie about virtue is deadlier than an honest flaw.
    4. Discipline without compassion becomes tyranny;
      compassion without discipline becomes decay.
    5. Ruthlessness is clarity.
      It is the courage to see — in others, and in oneself — without flinching.

    VII. Closing Reflection

    Civilization was never meant to be sterile; it was meant to be self-aware.
    Our ancestors worshipped gods who laughed, desired, erred, and repented — because they knew perfection without confession breeds rot.

    If modern society truly wants morality, it must first reclaim honesty.

    “The ancients wrote their contradictions into scripture.
    We write ours into hashtags.”

  • Between Dharma and Bhakti: When Morality Meets Devotion

    Introduction

    Ancient India’s two towering epics — the Mahābhārata and the Bhāgavata Purāṇa — seem to belong to the same spiritual civilization yet speak in entirely different moral dialects.
    The Mahābhārata is the story of dharma (righteous duty); the Bhāgavata is the song of bhakti (divine love).
    One celebrates ethical order; the other dissolves ethics in emotion.
    And between them stands Krishna — the same being who preaches restraint in the Gītā yet dances in abandon with the Gopīs under the moonlit sky.


    1 · The Moral Universe of the Mahābhārata

    The Mahābhārata is a profoundly human document — full of kings, doubts, vows, and tragic righteousness.
    It teaches that dharma is not a fixed code but a constant negotiation between truth and survival.
    Yudhishthira, embodiment of morality, attains only temporary heaven despite a lifetime of virtue, reminding us that social righteousness yields merit but not liberation.

    Even Draupadī’s unusual marriage to the five Pāṇḍavas was justified by reasoning rather than passion.
    Yudhishthira told the elders:

    It is said that a virtuous lady named Jatilā, of the race of Gotama, had married seven Rishis;
    and the daughter of a sage, born of a tree, was the wife of ten Prachetas brothers.
    Therefore, O Brahmana, I see no sin in our sharing one wife.
    Mahābhārata, Ādi Parva 185-186

    For Yudhishthira, moral worth lay in obedience and social harmony.
    The Mahābhārata’s world is one of hierarchy, inheritance, and law.


    2 · The Emotional Cosmos of the Bhāgavata

    Centuries later, the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam overturned that world.
    In the midnight forests of Vṛndāvana, the cowherd girls — the Gopīs — abandon family, reputation, and restraint to answer Krishna’s flute.
    Their act, though outwardly transgressive, becomes the highest form of surrender.

    nāyaṁ śriyo ’ṅga u nitānta-rateḥ prasādaḥ
    svar-yoṣitāṁ nalina-gandha-rucāṁ kuto ’nyāḥ |
    rāsotsave ’sya bhujadaṇḍa-gṛhīta-kaṇṭha-
    labdhāśiṣāṁ ya udagād vraja-sundarīṇām ॥
    Bhāgavata Purāṇa 10.47.60

    “O friend, what greater fortune could even the women of heaven have than the cowherd girls of Vraja, who were embraced by the arms of the Lord during the Rāsa dance?”

    And yet the scripture warns against imitation:

    naitat samācarej jātu manasāpi hy anīśvaraḥ |
    vinaśyaty ācaran mauḍhyād yathā rudro ’bdhijaṁ viṣam ॥
    Bhāgavata Purāṇa 10.33.30

    “One should never imitate the deeds of the Supreme; a fool who does so perishes, as one who drinks the ocean-churned poison would.”

    Here, passion becomes prayer; desire becomes devotion.
    The Gopīs’ so-called “debauchery” is actually the annihilation of ego — a fire so pure that even sin turns to light.


    3 · The Cunning God and the Moral Man

    Modern scholars such as Maurice Winternitz and V. R. Narla saw Krishna as the “cunning friend of the Pāṇḍavas,”
    a strategist who bends rules to win wars.
    And they were not wrong — from a human perspective.
    But the Bhāgavata reads the same episodes as divine strategy:
    Krishna’s “cunning” is cosmic calculus — the surgical removal of imbalance.

    Where the Mahābhārata ends in moral fatigue,
    the Bhāgavata begins in mystical surrender.


    4 · When Ethics Meets Ecstasy

    In truth, dharma and bhakti are not opposites but stages of evolution.
    Dharma trains the hands to act rightly; Bhakti trains the heart to love completely.
    The same Krishna who tells Arjuna,

    karmaṇy evādhikāras te mā phaleṣu kadācana …
    Bhagavad-Gītā 2.47

    to act without attachment,
    is the Krishna who later dissolves attachment through love in Vṛndāvana.

    The Bhāgavata proclaims:

    kāmaṁ krodhaṁ bhayaṁ snehaṁ aikyaṁ sauhṛdam eva ca |
    nityaṁ harau vidadhato yānti tan-mayatāṁ hi te ॥
    Bhāgavata Purāṇa 7.1.30

    “Whether through desire, anger, fear, affection, or friendship —
    those who fix their minds on Hari become one with Him.”

    Thus, even human emotion becomes a spiritual instrument when directed toward God.


    5 · A Mirror for Modern Times

    Today, most of us struggle to sustain even one marriage, one career, one ideal —
    and we gaze at mythic India with equal parts awe and disbelief.
    Yudhishthira’s restraint feels impossible; Krishna’s freedom feels dangerous.
    Yet both reveal the same truth: life without balance collapses.

    Righteousness without love becomes rigidity.
    Love without righteousness becomes chaos.
    The perfection of life lies not in imitating gods or sages but in understanding them.

    To live like Yudhishthira — disciplined, dutiful —
    yet to love like Krishna — infinitely and without fear —
    that is the tightrope of being human.


    References

    1. Mahābhārata, Ādi Parva 185-186 (Critical Edition) — discourse of Yudhishthira on Jatilā and the ten Prachetas brothers.
    2. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Canto 10, Chapters 30–33 (Rāsa-Pañcādhyāya).
       - 10.33.30 — warning against imitating divine acts.
       - 10.47.60 — glory of the Gopīs’ embrace in the Rāsa dance.
    3. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 7.1.30 — all emotions become divine when directed toward Hari.
    4. Bhagavad-Gītā 2.47 — detachment in action.

    Closing Thought

    Between dharma and bhakti lies the fragile truth of being human —
    to act rightly in the world, yet to love beyond reason.
    The Mahābhārata teaches us how to live;
    the Bhāgavata Purāṇa teaches us why.